OneBigWeb » Blog Archive » On the Evolution of Folksonomies and Folkschemas
“Folkschemas”, nice word. I guess this is something I am trying to do with StYLiD (Structure Your own Linked Data).
Linkexplorer.net – experimental structured tagging
The Linkexplorer organizes tagging by defining various relations between tags. This is similar to the approach used by BibSonomy. But there are different types of named relations (eg part-of, related-to, etc). This greatly helps to organize tags. However, I think tagging is quite uncontrolled and it will be difficult to have usable visualizations of relations between huge amounts of tags. Further, I am not sure if it should be called structured tagging. Some people use the term “structured tagging” to refer to structured metadata.
Folksonomy :: vanderwal.net
Thomas Vander Wal writes about Folksonomy.
BibSonomy::bibtex::Network Properties of Folksonomies
This is also a study about the network properties of folksonomy.
CiteULike: Folksonomy as a Complex Network
This is a study about the properties of the folksonomy network formed by connecting tags annotating the same resource.
Folksonomy is an emerging technology that works to classify the information over WWW through tagging the bookmarks, photos or other web-based contents. It is understood to be organized by every user while not limited to the authors of the contents and the professional editors. This study surveyed the folksonomy as a complex network. The result indicates that the network, which is composed of the tags from the folksonomy, displays both properties of small world and scale-free. However, the statistics only shows a local and static slice of the vast body of folksonomy which is still evolving