Archive for Folksonomy

Organizing Publications and Bookmarks in BibSonomy

BibSonomy::bibtex::Organizing Publications and Bookmarks in BibSonomy

Another publication about Bibsonomy in the workshop at Banff, Canada.

Comments

BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System

BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System

I recently discovered this work related to my work SocioBiblog.

Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this paper we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe our own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks and publication references in a kind of personal library.

Comments

Product Pipeline

Product Pipeline - 10/15/2006 - netConnect
Melissa L. Rethlefsen looks at social reference managers and what they mean for librarians

Comments

Clustering comes to Flickr

Clustering comes to Flickr

I recently noticed that Flickr now shows clustering of tags - something I wanted to do.

Comments (1)

Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space

Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space
Summary

The use of clustering techniques enhances the user experience and thus the success of collaborative tagging services. We show that clustering techniques can improve the user experience of current tagging services. We first describe current limitations of tagging services, second, we give an overview of existing approaches. We then describe the algorithms we used for tag clustering and give experimental results and a variety of conclusions.

Comments

Ontology of Folksonomy

Ontology of Folksonomy
Ontologies are enabling technology for the Semantic Web. They are a means for people to state what they mean by the terms used in data that they might generate, share, or consume. Folksonomies are an emergent phenomenon of the Social Web. They arise from data about how people associate terms with content that they generate, share, or consume. Recently the two ideas have been put into opposition, as if they were right and left poles of a political spectrum. This is a false dichotomy; they are more like apples and oranges. In fact, as the Semantic Web matures and the Social Web grows, there is increasing value in applying Semantic Web technologies to the data of the Social Web. This article is an attempt to clarify the distinct roles for ontologies and folksonomies, and previews some new work that applies the two ideas together - an ontology of folksonomy.

Comments

Using Ontologies to Strengthen Folksonomies and Enrich Information Retrieval in Weblogs: Theoretical background and corporate use-case

ICWSM || Full Paper || Using Ontologies to Strengthen Folksonomies and Enrich Information Retrieval in Weblogs: Theoretical background and corporate use-case

This work is similar to my thesis on semantic blogging. Tags are mapped to ontology in this work while blog entries are directly mapped to ontology in my work.

Abstract:
While free-tagging classification is widely used in social software implementations and especially in weblogs, it raises various issues regarding information retrieval. In this paper, we describe an approach that mixes folksonomies and semantic web technologies in order to solve some of these problems, and to enrich information retrieval capabilities among blog posts.
We first introduce the corporate context of the study and the issues we have faced that motivated our approach. Then, we argue how the use of domain ontologies combined with the SIOC vocabulary on the top of an existing folksonomy and weblogging platform offers a way to get rid of free-tagging classification flaws, and enhances information retrieval by suggesting related blog posts.
Aside of the theoretical background, this paper also focuses on implementation. We present experimental results of this approach through the example of add-ons to a corporate blogging platform and the associated semantic web search engine, that extensively uses RDF and other semantic web technologies to find appropriate information and suggest related posts.

Comments

BibSonomy

BibSonomy::
BibSonomy is a system for sharing bookmarks and lists of literature. When discovering a bookmark or a publication on the web, you can store it on our server. You can add tags to your entry to retrieve it more easily. This is very similar to the bookmarks/favorites that you store within your browser. The advantage of BibSonomy is that you can access your data from whereever you are. Furthermore, you can discover more bookmarks and publications from your friends and other people.

Comments

Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata

Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata
This paper examines user-‍generated metadata as implemented and applied in two web services designed to share and organize digital media to better understand grassroots classification. Metadata - data about data - allows systems to collocate related information, and helps users find relevant information…..

Comments

Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags?

Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags?
A folksonomy is a type of distributed classification system. It is usually created by a group of individuals, typically the resource users. Users add tags to online items, such as images, videos, bookmarks and text. These tags are then shared and sometimes refined. A general review of social bookmarking tools, one popular use area of folksonomies, was given in the April edition of D-Lib [1]. In the article the authors elaborate on the approach taken by social classification systems and the motivators behind tagging. They write, “…tags are just one kind of metadata and are not a replacement for formal classification systems such as Dublin Core, MODS, etc…. Rather, they are a supplemental means to organise information and order search results.”

Comments

« Previous entries · Next entries »